Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Analog Pussy (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Passes WP:MUSIC per sources found. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Analog Pussy

Fails WP:MUSIC, no sources found. Speedy declined because it survived an AFD four years ago, based entirely on WP:ILIKEIT !votes. This crap has sat around that long without a single good source?! Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:56, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Weak keep (for the duo) ~~No independent sources.~~ Seems like there are a few independent sources that are specifically about the duo. (Not sure about the quality/importance of the sources though.) --RegentsPark (My narrowboat) 21:01, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, can't find any independent sources, fails GNG and music specific guidelines. A new name 2008 (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Nothing more to add to nom. Trevor Marron (talk) 22:57, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 23:50, 8 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - say what? AP is huge in the global goa/psytrance scene, same level as e.g. Astral Projection. I need to go make dinner (mmm, tacos!), but will find sources after. //roux 00:24, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sources found: Allmusic, Montreal Mirror, Edge Boston, LA Weekly. Therefore the band is/are notable. The previous AFD doesn't seem to have many WP:ILIKEIT !votes, for what it's worth. The article really needs someone to improve it using sources, then perhaps it wouldn't be "crap". This doesn't come close to being a speedy candidate, the previous AFD is clear from the first page of article history, has been noted on the talk page since 2006, and re-adding a {{db-band}} tag after another editor has removed it is simply unacceptable. Where's that WP:TROUT...?.--Michig (talk) 20:18, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The album articles could go though, with the exception of Trance N Roll for which I found 2 reviews - tracklisting, "X is an album by Y", plus decorative cover art isn't enough to make an article.--Michig (talk) 20:23, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep: per above's refs. Needs to be added to article. As it stood originally, was a good AfD candidate. --It's me...Sallicio!^{$\color {Red}\oplus$} 23:44, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.